Know the standard
Named criteria and maximum points appear in the brief before acceptance. Review scores total 100.
Good feedback starts with clear expectations.
You should know what good work looks like before you start—and understand a review when it comes back. These are the standards behind the current pilot.
See your progress
Every submission and resubmission is preserved. Revision requests never overwrite earlier work.
Private files
Uploads use private storage and short-lived access links scoped to the authorized user and record.
Original work
Briefs are internally authored or appropriately licensed. TaskBench does not present outside customer identities.
Understand your rewards
See what is awaiting review, what has been approved, and what has been paid separately by the administrator. Corrections include a recorded reason.
Human decision
Manual QA is authoritative. Development files may be reviewed, but untrusted contractor code is never executed.
Illustrative review · not participant data
More useful than just a score.
Your comparison explains the options clearly. Identify the missing fact most likely to change your recommendation, and explain how you would check it.
Accuracy24 / 30
Evidence21 / 25
Structure20 / 25
Language17 / 20
Outcome
Revision requested
82 / 100
Payout minimum
$10 CAD
Default threshold; an administrator may record an override reason.
Data collected
Work records
No banking details, tax handling, identity documents, or payment credentials.
Access model
Invitation only
The working portal remains private. Early-access interest does not create a contractor account.